Nursing Home Staffing Profile — 2025Q3
How South Carolina's 183 facilities grade out
Where facilities fall across the staffing spectrum
For-profit facilities consistently staff lower than non-profit and government-run homes
Top 5 by total nurse HPRD
Bottom 5 by total nurse HPRD
Pick any two South Carolina nursing homes and see how they stack up across every metric
Staffing metrics by county in South Carolina — click a county to see individual facilities
| County | Facilities ↓ | Avg HPRD | RN HPRD | Meet Benchmark | Grades |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸Greenville | 19 | 3.92 | 0.67 | 52.6% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Spartanburg | 15 | 3.81 | 0.66 | 46.7% | Mostly C |
| ▸Richland | 14 | 4.21 | 0.67 | 64.3% | Mixed C/A+ |
| ▸Charleston | 11 | 3.95 | 0.66 | 54.5% | Mixed D/C |
| ▸Florence | 9 | 4.12 | 0.51 | 77.8% | Mixed D/A |
| ▸York | 8 | 4.13 | 0.98 | 75.0% | Mixed C/A |
| ▸Horry | 8 | 3.89 | 0.66 | 62.5% | Mixed C/A |
| ▸Beaufort | 7 | 4.57 | 1.02 | 85.7% | Mixed A+/B |
| ▸Aiken | 6 | 3.78 | 0.44 | 83.3% | Mixed D/C |
| ▸Lexington | 6 | 4.41 | 0.80 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Pickens | 5 | 3.77 | 0.87 | 20.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Anderson | 5 | 3.43 | 0.41 | 60.0% | Mixed D/B |
| ▸Darlington | 4 | 4.42 | 0.53 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Dorchester | 4 | 3.59 | 0.51 | 25.0% | Mixed C/A |
| ▸Orangeburg | 4 | 3.33 | 0.34 | 25.0% | Mixed D/C |
| ▸Berkeley | 4 | 3.93 | 0.70 | 75.0% | Mixed B/A |
| ▸Cherokee | 3 | 4.07 | 0.41 | 33.3% | Mixed B/D |
| ▸Laurens | 3 | 3.65 | 0.70 | 33.3% | Mostly C |
| ▸Sumter | 3 | 3.05 | 0.32 | 0.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Greenwood | 3 | 3.54 | 0.69 | 33.3% | Mostly C |
| ▸Georgetown | 3 | 3.96 | 0.70 | 33.3% | Mixed A+/C |
| ▸Barnwell | 3 | 3.59 | 0.52 | 66.7% | Mostly C |
| ▸Newberry | 2 | 3.80 | 0.52 | 100.0% | Mixed B/D |
| ▸Chesterfield | 2 | 3.20 | 0.36 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Clarendon | 2 | 3.87 | 0.57 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Colleton | 2 | 3.37 | 0.56 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Dillon | 2 | 3.35 | 0.36 | 50.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Fairfield | 2 | 2.99 | 0.45 | 0.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Jasper | 2 | 3.56 | 0.62 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Kershaw | 2 | 3.63 | 0.60 | 50.0% | Mixed A/D |
| ▸Lancaster | 2 | 3.36 | 0.37 | 50.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Marion | 2 | 4.18 | 0.79 | 50.0% | Mixed A/C |
| ▸Oconee | 2 | 3.70 | 0.60 | 50.0% | Mixed B/D |
| ▸Union | 2 | 3.43 | 0.44 | 50.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Williamsburg | 2 | 3.26 | 0.62 | 50.0% | Mixed B/D |
| ▸Bamberg | 1 | 3.46 | 0.37 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Lee | 1 | 3.61 | 0.40 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Hampton | 1 | 3.14 | 0.32 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Edgefield | 1 | 3.14 | 0.50 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Saluda | 1 | 4.44 | 0.70 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Chester | 1 | 3.93 | 0.71 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Mccormick | 1 | 2.91 | 0.28 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Calhoun | 1 | 2.96 | 0.46 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Marlboro | 1 | 3.18 | 0.40 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Abbeville | 1 | 4.60 | 1.18 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
The spread between best and worst staffed facilities
Source: CMS Staffing & Quality Data — 2025Q3 · data.cms.gov
Staffing grades are based on CMS-published thresholds and research recommendations. CMS is not affiliated with and does not endorse this website.