Nursing Home Staffing Profile — 2025Q3
How New York's 589 facilities grade out
Where facilities fall across the staffing spectrum
For-profit facilities consistently staff lower than non-profit and government-run homes
Top 5 by total nurse HPRD
Bottom 5 by total nurse HPRD
Pick any two New York nursing homes and see how they stack up across every metric
Staffing metrics by county in New York — click a county to see individual facilities
| County | Facilities ↓ | Avg HPRD | RN HPRD | Meet Benchmark | Grades |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸Queens | 54 | 3.44 | 0.76 | 42.6% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Westchester | 42 | 4.16 | 1.19 | 57.1% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Bronx | 42 | 3.23 | 0.65 | 26.2% | Mixed D/C |
| ▸Suffolk | 41 | 3.84 | 0.81 | 58.5% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Kings | 40 | 3.56 | 0.71 | 50.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Nassau | 36 | 3.72 | 0.80 | 58.3% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Erie | 34 | 3.81 | 0.62 | 70.6% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Monroe | 32 | 3.93 | 0.49 | 78.1% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Oneida | 17 | 3.52 | 0.42 | 52.9% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸New York | 16 | 3.78 | 0.99 | 50.0% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Onondaga | 14 | 4.17 | 0.93 | 78.6% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Dutchess | 12 | 3.19 | 0.43 | 33.3% | Mixed D/C |
| ▸Albany | 11 | 4.37 | 0.71 | 72.7% | Mixed D/A |
| ▸Richmond | 10 | 3.47 | 0.75 | 50.0% | Mixed D/C |
| ▸Niagara | 10 | 3.38 | 0.53 | 50.0% | Mixed C/F |
| ▸Rockland | 10 | 4.15 | 1.06 | 70.0% | Mixed B/A+ |
| ▸Orange | 10 | 3.67 | 0.71 | 60.0% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Broome | 9 | 3.93 | 0.53 | 66.7% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Rensselaer | 9 | 3.58 | 0.53 | 66.7% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Ulster | 7 | 3.82 | 0.61 | 71.4% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Steuben | 6 | 3.42 | 0.43 | 16.7% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Schenectady | 5 | 3.94 | 0.71 | 80.0% | Mixed C/A |
| ▸Cattaraugus | 5 | 3.59 | 0.51 | 40.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Chautauqua | 5 | 2.88 | 0.43 | 0.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Montgomery | 5 | 3.30 | 0.47 | 40.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Ontario | 5 | 3.96 | 0.52 | 60.0% | Mixed B/D |
| ▸Tompkins | 5 | 3.87 | 0.62 | 80.0% | Mixed D/A |
| ▸Allegany | 4 | 3.58 | 0.63 | 50.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Herkimer | 4 | 3.31 | 0.51 | 50.0% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Genesee | 4 | 3.24 | 0.41 | 0.0% | Mixed D/C |
| ▸Oswego | 4 | 3.21 | 0.41 | 0.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Columbia | 4 | 2.69 | 0.46 | 25.0% | Mixed D/C |
| ▸St. Lawrence | 4 | 3.37 | 0.64 | 25.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Clinton | 4 | 3.37 | 0.72 | 25.0% | Mixed C/A |
| ▸Chemung | 4 | 3.96 | 0.52 | 75.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Cayuga | 4 | 3.62 | 0.46 | 25.0% | Mixed D/B |
| ▸Warren | 4 | 3.23 | 0.57 | 25.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Washington | 4 | 3.39 | 0.49 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Wayne | 4 | 3.72 | 0.47 | 50.0% | Mixed D/B |
| ▸Essex | 3 | 2.91 | 0.45 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Delaware | 3 | 3.38 | 0.57 | 66.7% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Cortland | 3 | 3.84 | 0.56 | 33.3% | Mixed A/C |
| ▸Livingston | 3 | 3.50 | 0.59 | 33.3% | Mostly C |
| ▸Chenango | 3 | 3.93 | 0.75 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Jefferson | 3 | 1.42 | 0.36 | 0.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸Madison | 3 | 3.55 | 0.69 | 33.3% | Mostly C |
| ▸Sullivan | 3 | 3.39 | 0.49 | 33.3% | Mostly C |
| ▸Orleans | 3 | 3.48 | 0.50 | 33.3% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Otsego | 3 | 3.38 | 0.57 | 33.3% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Franklin | 2 | 4.12 | 0.96 | 100.0% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Putnam | 2 | 3.32 | 0.50 | 50.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Greene | 2 | 3.53 | 0.41 | 50.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Tioga | 2 | 3.07 | 0.43 | 50.0% | Mixed C/F |
| ▸Yates | 2 | 3.61 | 0.39 | 50.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Saratoga | 2 | 3.88 | 0.56 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Fulton | 2 | 3.90 | 0.60 | 100.0% | Mixed A/D |
| ▸Wyoming | 2 | 3.36 | 0.45 | 50.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Lewis | 1 | 4.26 | 0.85 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
| ▸Schuyler | 1 | 4.13 | 0.65 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Seneca | 1 | 3.85 | 0.36 | 100.0% | Mostly D |
The spread between best and worst staffed facilities
Source: CMS Staffing & Quality Data — 2025Q3 · data.cms.gov
Staffing grades are based on CMS-published thresholds and research recommendations. CMS is not affiliated with and does not endorse this website.