Nursing Home Staffing Profile — 2025Q3
How New Mexico's 67 facilities grade out
Where facilities fall across the staffing spectrum
For-profit facilities consistently staff lower than non-profit and government-run homes
Top 5 by total nurse HPRD
Bottom 5 by total nurse HPRD
Pick any two New Mexico nursing homes and see how they stack up across every metric
Staffing metrics by county in New Mexico — click a county to see individual facilities
| County | Facilities ↓ | Avg HPRD | RN HPRD | Meet Benchmark | Grades |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸Bernalillo | 18 | 3.60 | 0.71 | 44.4% | Mostly C |
| ▸Dona Ana | 6 | 4.19 | 0.53 | 50.0% | Mixed D/A+ |
| ▸San Juan | 6 | 3.51 | 0.64 | 33.3% | Mixed C/A |
| ▸Chaves | 3 | 3.33 | 0.46 | 33.3% | Mostly C |
| ▸Sandoval | 3 | 4.15 | 0.67 | 33.3% | Mixed A+/C |
| ▸Lea | 3 | 3.04 | 0.46 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Curry | 3 | 3.62 | 0.57 | 33.3% | Mostly D |
| ▸Mckinley | 2 | 3.12 | 0.57 | 0.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Cibola | 2 | 4.33 | 0.87 | 100.0% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Colfax | 2 | 3.83 | 1.34 | 50.0% | Mixed A+/F |
| ▸Eddy | 2 | 3.52 | 0.69 | 50.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Grant | 2 | 4.73 | 0.87 | 50.0% | Mixed A+/D |
| ▸Otero | 2 | 3.06 | 0.52 | 0.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸San Miguel | 2 | 2.81 | 0.68 | 0.0% | Mixed C/F |
| ▸Santa Fe | 2 | 1.60 | 0.24 | 0.0% | Mixed D/F |
| ▸Sierra | 2 | 4.54 | 0.44 | 50.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Taos | 1 | 3.11 | 0.56 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Union | 1 | 3.17 | 0.51 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Valencia | 1 | 2.94 | 0.44 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Socorro | 1 | 3.70 | 0.53 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Roosevelt | 1 | 3.35 | 0.53 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Luna | 1 | 3.01 | 0.32 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Los Alamos | 1 | 3.27 | 0.39 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
The spread between best and worst staffed facilities
Source: CMS Staffing & Quality Data — 2025Q3 · data.cms.gov
Staffing grades are based on CMS-published thresholds and research recommendations. CMS is not affiliated with and does not endorse this website.