Nursing Home Staffing Profile — 2025Q3
How Mississippi's 200 facilities grade out
Where facilities fall across the staffing spectrum
For-profit facilities consistently staff lower than non-profit and government-run homes
Top 5 by total nurse HPRD
Bottom 5 by total nurse HPRD
Pick any two Mississippi nursing homes and see how they stack up across every metric
Staffing metrics by county in Mississippi — click a county to see individual facilities
| County | Facilities ↓ | Avg HPRD | RN HPRD | Meet Benchmark | Grades |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸Lee | 11 | 3.78 | 0.50 | 72.7% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Lauderdale | 9 | 4.39 | 0.76 | 88.9% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Hinds | 8 | 4.12 | 0.43 | 100.0% | Mixed D/B |
| ▸Forrest | 8 | 5.04 | 1.16 | 100.0% | Mixed B/A+ |
| ▸Rankin | 8 | 4.81 | 0.77 | 100.0% | Mixed B/A |
| ▸Harrison | 7 | 3.74 | 0.46 | 57.1% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Jackson | 6 | 4.43 | 0.99 | 66.7% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Madison | 5 | 4.49 | 0.47 | 100.0% | Mixed B/D |
| ▸Washington | 5 | 3.63 | 0.53 | 80.0% | Mixed B/D |
| ▸Jones | 4 | 4.29 | 0.46 | 100.0% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸Lowndes | 4 | 4.22 | 0.75 | 100.0% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Bolivar | 4 | 3.61 | 0.67 | 25.0% | Mixed C/A |
| ▸Warren | 4 | 4.03 | 0.64 | 100.0% | Mixed B/A |
| ▸Lincoln | 4 | 3.73 | 0.52 | 75.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Pearl River | 3 | 4.54 | 0.65 | 100.0% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Marion | 3 | 4.14 | 0.46 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸De Soto | 3 | 3.71 | 0.55 | 66.7% | Mostly B |
| ▸Neshoba | 3 | 3.83 | 0.92 | 100.0% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Monroe | 3 | 3.55 | 0.70 | 66.7% | Mostly C |
| ▸Leflore | 3 | 4.19 | 0.76 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Pontotoc | 3 | 5.27 | 0.84 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
| ▸Tippah | 3 | 3.96 | 0.61 | 66.7% | Mostly C |
| ▸Adams | 3 | 3.67 | 0.30 | 66.7% | Mostly D |
| ▸Greene | 2 | 4.72 | 0.60 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Alcorn | 2 | 4.22 | 0.60 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Calhoun | 2 | 4.48 | 0.47 | 100.0% | Mixed B/D |
| ▸Chickasaw | 2 | 4.43 | 1.07 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
| ▸Clay | 2 | 4.45 | 0.63 | 100.0% | Mixed A/C |
| ▸Coahoma | 2 | 3.80 | 0.47 | 50.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Copiah | 2 | 4.10 | 0.40 | 100.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Covington | 2 | 4.46 | 0.80 | 100.0% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸George | 2 | 4.62 | 0.63 | 100.0% | Mixed A/C |
| ▸Grenada | 2 | 3.64 | 0.45 | 100.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Hancock | 2 | 4.06 | 0.46 | 100.0% | Mixed B/D |
| ▸Holmes | 2 | 4.22 | 0.37 | 100.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Itawamba | 2 | 3.95 | 0.68 | 100.0% | Mixed A/C |
| ▸Leake | 2 | 4.58 | 0.67 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Marshall | 2 | 4.09 | 0.48 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Newton | 2 | 4.70 | 0.75 | 100.0% | Mixed A/B |
| ▸Oktibbeha | 2 | 3.54 | 0.62 | 50.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Panola | 2 | 3.78 | 0.47 | 100.0% | Mixed B/D |
| ▸Pike | 2 | 4.38 | 0.66 | 50.0% | Mixed A/C |
| ▸Prentiss | 2 | 4.34 | 0.80 | 50.0% | Mixed A/C |
| ▸Simpson | 2 | 3.77 | 0.49 | 100.0% | Mixed B/D |
| ▸Stone | 2 | 4.37 | 0.73 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Sunflower | 2 | 4.72 | 0.69 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Tishomingo | 2 | 3.75 | 0.64 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Union | 2 | 4.19 | 0.50 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Walthall | 2 | 4.36 | 0.63 | 100.0% | Mixed B/D |
| ▸Webster | 2 | 3.91 | 0.71 | 50.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Winston | 2 | 4.95 | 1.04 | 100.0% | Mixed A+/B |
| ▸Yazoo | 2 | 4.65 | 0.56 | 100.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Wayne | 1 | 3.66 | 0.61 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Claiborne | 1 | 5.37 | 0.48 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Perry | 1 | 3.85 | 0.39 | 100.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Tunica | 1 | 5.36 | 0.52 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Choctaw | 1 | 4.08 | 0.51 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Yalobusha | 1 | 4.21 | 0.35 | 100.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Quitman | 1 | 4.62 | 0.40 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Carroll | 1 | 3.48 | 0.75 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Scott | 1 | 4.50 | 0.60 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Wilkinson | 1 | 5.61 | 0.46 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Smith | 1 | 4.87 | 0.85 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
| ▸Attala | 1 | 3.69 | 0.41 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Lamar | 1 | 2.92 | 0.18 | 0.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸Lawrence | 1 | 3.81 | 0.38 | 100.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Amite | 1 | 3.77 | 0.32 | 100.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Lafayette | 1 | 4.16 | 0.40 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Kemper | 1 | 5.12 | 0.68 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Jefferson Davis | 1 | 4.48 | 0.88 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
| ▸Jefferson | 1 | 4.68 | 0.61 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Jasper | 1 | 4.18 | 0.51 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Humphreys | 1 | 4.32 | 0.63 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Tallahatchie | 1 | 4.34 | 0.45 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Franklin | 1 | 4.54 | 0.62 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Montgomery | 1 | 3.31 | 0.57 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Clarke | 1 | 3.31 | 0.67 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Tate | 1 | 4.03 | 0.65 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Noxubee | 1 | 4.25 | 0.37 | 100.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Benton | 1 | 4.47 | 0.86 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
The spread between best and worst staffed facilities
Source: CMS Staffing & Quality Data — 2025Q3 · data.cms.gov
Staffing grades are based on CMS-published thresholds and research recommendations. CMS is not affiliated with and does not endorse this website.