Nursing Home Staffing Profile — 2025Q3
How Colorado's 208 facilities grade out
Where facilities fall across the staffing spectrum
For-profit facilities consistently staff lower than non-profit and government-run homes
Top 5 by total nurse HPRD
Bottom 5 by total nurse HPRD
Pick any two Colorado nursing homes and see how they stack up across every metric
Staffing metrics by county in Colorado — click a county to see individual facilities
| County | Facilities ↓ | Avg HPRD | RN HPRD | Meet Benchmark | Grades |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸Jefferson | 23 | 3.94 | 0.85 | 47.8% | Mostly C |
| ▸Denver | 23 | 3.49 | 0.72 | 43.5% | Mixed C/B |
| ▸El Paso | 20 | 3.64 | 0.86 | 40.0% | Mixed C/A |
| ▸Arapahoe | 19 | 3.90 | 0.82 | 68.4% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Adams | 14 | 3.51 | 0.70 | 28.6% | Mostly C |
| ▸Larimer | 13 | 3.66 | 0.90 | 38.5% | Mostly C |
| ▸Boulder | 10 | 4.14 | 0.84 | 40.0% | Mixed C/A+ |
| ▸Pueblo | 9 | 3.50 | 0.87 | 55.6% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Weld | 8 | 4.00 | 0.96 | 75.0% | Mixed B/A |
| ▸Douglas | 7 | 4.38 | 1.22 | 71.4% | Mixed A+/C |
| ▸Mesa | 7 | 3.59 | 0.77 | 28.6% | Mostly C |
| ▸Fremont | 6 | 3.15 | 0.75 | 16.7% | Mostly C |
| ▸Garfield | 4 | 3.92 | 1.01 | 75.0% | Mixed B/A+ |
| ▸Delta | 3 | 3.43 | 0.93 | 33.3% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Montrose | 3 | 3.83 | 0.74 | 66.7% | Mostly B |
| ▸Morgan | 3 | 3.61 | 0.80 | 66.7% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Rio Grande | 3 | 3.63 | 1.14 | 33.3% | Mostly C |
| ▸Baca | 2 | 5.30 | 0.84 | 100.0% | Mixed A+/B |
| ▸Alamosa | 2 | 3.48 | 0.81 | 50.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Prowers | 2 | 3.11 | 0.70 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Otero | 2 | 3.76 | 0.65 | 50.0% | Mixed B/C |
| ▸Montezuma | 2 | 3.20 | 0.47 | 0.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸La Plata | 2 | 3.46 | 1.05 | 50.0% | Mixed A/D |
| ▸Logan | 2 | 3.08 | 0.50 | 0.0% | Mixed C/D |
| ▸Broomfield | 1 | 3.82 | 0.60 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Archuleta | 1 | 2.39 | 0.58 | 0.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸Bent | 1 | 4.22 | 1.05 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
| ▸Chaffee | 1 | 3.24 | 1.06 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Cheyenne | 1 | 4.68 | 0.96 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
| ▸Conejos | 1 | 3.51 | 0.62 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Crowley | 1 | 3.55 | 0.69 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Eagle | 1 | 5.17 | 1.64 | 100.0% | Mostly A+ |
| ▸Gunnison | 1 | 4.31 | 1.14 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
| ▸Huerfano | 1 | 4.56 | 1.22 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
| ▸Kit Carson | 1 | 2.70 | 0.77 | 0.0% | Mostly D |
| ▸Las Animas | 1 | 3.38 | 0.43 | 0.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Moffat | 1 | 3.63 | 0.81 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Phillips | 1 | 2.39 | 0.35 | 0.0% | Mostly F |
| ▸Routt | 1 | 4.98 | 0.89 | 100.0% | Mostly A |
| ▸Sedgwick | 1 | 7.02 | 0.55 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Teller | 1 | 3.73 | 0.88 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
| ▸Washington | 1 | 4.67 | 0.51 | 100.0% | Mostly C |
| ▸Yuma | 1 | 3.58 | 0.76 | 100.0% | Mostly B |
The spread between best and worst staffed facilities
Source: CMS Staffing & Quality Data — 2025Q3 · data.cms.gov
Staffing grades are based on CMS-published thresholds and research recommendations. CMS is not affiliated with and does not endorse this website.