Home›Texas›Harris County›Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
D
Poor

Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

7514 Kingsley St · Houston, TX 77087

7136448393 · For profit - Corporation

169 beds97.3 residents90 staff
CMS Five-Star Ratings
Overall
★★★★★
Staffing
★★★★★
Quality
★★★★★
Inspections
★★★★★
Staffing Grades
C
Below Standard
Total Staff
D
Poor
RN Staff
D
Poor
Overall
✗CMS Benchmark(≥ 3.48 HPRD)
✗RN Recommendation(≥ 0.75 HPRD)
✗Research Standard(≥ 4.10 HPRD)
📋

What This Means in Plain English

Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center receives an overall staffing grade of D (Poor). With 3.2761 total nurse hours per resident per day, this facility falls below the CMS staffing benchmark of 3.48 HPRD and has RN staffing of 0.2892 HPRD, below the recommended 0.75. It is 0.62 HPRD below the national average.

Weekend staffing stays relatively consistent — dropping 11.11% compared to weekdays. The facility has low agency staff usage (0% of hours), suggesting a mostly permanent workforce.

Staffing levels have been trending upward over recent quarters.

🔍 Areas of Concern (2)

🚨Does not meet the CMS staffing benchmark of 3.48 HPRD. Current: 3.2761 HPRD — needs 0.20 more hours per resident per day.
⚠️RN staffing (0.2892 HPRD) is below the research-recommended minimum of 0.75 HPRD. This means less clinical oversight per resident.

✨ Strengths (2)

✅No days with zero registered nurse hours this quarter
✅Low agency staff usage (0%) — mostly permanent, familiar staff
Total Nurse HPRD
3.2761hrs/resident/day▼ 0.62
CMS benchmark: 3.48
RN HPRD
0.2892hrs/resident/day▼ 0.39
Recommended: 0.75
Weekend Drop-off
11.11%
3.3823 weekday → 3.0066 weekend
Agency Staff
0%
0% of RN hours from contractors
Days with Zero RN
0days this quarter
4+ days = auto 1-star
CNA HPRD
1.7788hrs/resident/day
Direct care aides
LPN HPRD
0.8205hrs/resident/day
Licensed practical nurses
Consistency
0.3236std dev
Lower = more predictable

HPRD Over Time

Total nurse staffing hours per resident per day, by quarter

Total HPRD (shaded area)RN HPRDCMS Benchmark (3.48) — staffing standardResearch Standard (4.10) — recommended level

How Does This Facility Compare?

Compared to county, state, and national averages for total nurse HPRD

vs. Harris County Average-0.30 HPRD
3.58
03.28 HPRD
vs. Texas State Average-0.13 HPRD
3.40
03.28 HPRD
vs. National Average-0.62 HPRD
3.90
03.28 HPRD
■ Colored bar = this facility · | Black line = average · Based on 2025Q3 data

Nearby Facilities

Compare with other nursing homes in the area

FacilityDistanceGradeTotal HPRDRN HPRDCMS Rating
Afton Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation Center ★
Houston · This facility
—
D
3.27610.2892★☆☆☆☆
Avir at Courtyard
Houston
0.7 mi
F
3.85480.0873★★★☆☆
Sharpville Residence and Rehabilitation Center
Houston
13.5 mi
D
3.37830.3292★★★★☆
The Lev At town Park
Houston
15.1 mi
D
3.03760.3409★★☆☆☆
PARADIGM AT FIRST COLONY
MISSOURI CITY
18.2 mi
C
3.42370.5011★☆☆☆☆
Oakmont Healthcare and Rehabilitation of Humble
Humble
20.3 mi
D
3.44820.3686☆☆☆☆☆

Inspection History & Penalties

Health inspection results from state surveys — most recent first

13
Inspections
43
Total Deficiencies
$92,576
Fines Assessed
Nov 21, 2025Health
1 deficiency cited· Includes actual harm
▼
Oct 27, 2025Health
10 deficiencies cited· Includes actual harm
▼
Jul 11, 2025Health
1 deficiency cited· Includes actual harm
▼
Apr 9, 2025Health
8 deficiencies cited
▼
Apr 1, 2025Health
3 deficiencies cited· Includes actual harm
▼
Mar 13, 2025Health
2 deficiencies cited
▼
Nov 27, 2024Health
2 deficiencies cited
▼
Nov 14, 2024Health
1 deficiency cited
▼
Sep 13, 2023Health
6 deficiencies cited· Includes actual harm
▼
Mar 7, 2023Health
1 deficiency cited
▼
Feb 23, 2023Health
1 deficiency cited
▼
Feb 7, 2023Health
5 deficiencies cited
▼
Nov 10, 2022Health
2 deficiencies cited
▼

Penalty History

Jan 14, 2026Fine
$22,315
Oct 27, 2025Fine
$50,400
Sep 13, 2023Fine
$19,861
CMS Severity Scale
A–C: No Harm / PotentialD–F: No Harm but ConcernG–H: Actual HarmI–L: Immediate Jeopardy

Source: CMS Staffing & Quality Data — 2025Q3 · data.cms.gov

Staffing grades are based on CMS-published thresholds and research recommendations. CMS is not affiliated with and does not endorse this website.